Security Threat Analysis – Read Through this Thorough Consumer Report in Relation to this Security Threat Analysis.

Perhaps, you happen to be unaware there is however a sophisticated research division for future technologies allotted to the usa Government intelligence agencies and industrial intelligence complex. It's called IARPA and is particularly an ingenious concept in accordance with the DARPA model; High-risk - High Gain method of advanced research and development. That makes sense right, especially considering we are now living in a world fraught with cyber hackers, corporate espionage, and terrorists. What this means is our intelligence agencies needs to be on the ball, and they must be right 100% of the time whilst the evil-doers only have to obtain it right once you find.

Now then, consider in the event you will the massive quantity of data we have been collecting on individual citizens these days online. In addition to that, but everyone presently has a brilliant phone, an e-mail address, and maybe a couple of social networking pages. Folks also make comments on articles they read in the media into little boxes and press the submit button. As it is rather easy to determine who someone is dependant on their ISP address, their social media profile, their mobile phone number, and the way they write - it is rather very easy to do security threats to find out if they may be a threat risk.

Today, the artificial intelligent computers which collect this all data have not been optimized or programmed all that well, and thus these are flagging far too many false positives. However each time someone gets away by using a crime against humanity, a terrorist act, a hacking event, a criminal act, and even spying the authorities can go back and look at their ways of operation, their writings, and gain clues into the human psyche that goes as well as such folks. With each time the artificial intelligent computers improve at guesstimating within a close tolerance of probability the type of individuals they are seeking - the better they may work. Should you be IARPA wouldn't you look into this?

Okay so, as this has all but going on quite a very long time it seems sensible that these artificial intelligent computers are receiving rather good at the Lone Wolf assessment (Lone Wolf could be someone just like the Unabomber for example). Think of the lone wolf as the hardest kind of terrorist to locate, somebody who works alone, has hardly any communication with the outside world, detailed plans which can be never distributed to anyone, and for that reason few clues to provide them away, or few associates, Facebook friends, or collaborators to make them in. It is therefore very difficult to go into their brains and discover what they're thinking without contacting them underneath the auspice of some important reason apart from the exact surveillance.

Put simply it requires manpower, and a really good story to even get to a degree to speak with this sort of individual. However because everybody is connected now and everybody has the ability to be geo-tracked, and it has an e-mail address, or even a Facebook page there are numerous approaches to speak to these folks. One problem using that is manpower. Therefore it's obvious that later on artificial intelligent computers, true artificial intelligence as per Alan Turing's famous AI test (the power of your computer to fool a human into thinking that it is actually conversing with another human) - will contact they and begin up some form of conversation.

The simplest way to do this will be for the artificial intelligent computer to search through each of the data, including all of the writings that might have been posted in forums, responding to online media articles, and each of the postings on blogs, and social networking pages. Following that the artificial intelligent computer are able to use the individual's own words, and modify those sentences using similar words with similar meaning from the thesaurus, in the database of your AI software program - and this AI computer should be able to talk with the individual on a one-on-one basis.

In doing so, the AI computer will likely be gathering information from that conversation together with something that the person types in an e-mail. All that could then be loaded in to a database and included in all the collected words already written, or spoken in to a mobile phone, provided that the intelligence agencies have obtained the ability to listen in. Needless to say, each of the public information will not likely need to have a permission slip or court subpoena. It really is quite possible that eventually these AI systems will be able to correspond with the individual every so often, checking in on their psychological displacement, or progress, further assessing if they have increased the possible risk of committing a violent act, or if perhaps that individual will likely be downgraded to a new level.

As soon as the individual actually gets to top of the level, and it appears that these are either willing or willing to commit this sort of act, that's when human intervention can take place, and merely once they become a menace to society or our government in just a strong probability, mathematically speaking. As time passes better algorithms will likely be used and thru practice better techniques will be learned to make sure you will find hardly any false positives. Now then, I will hear the EFF - Electronic Freedom Foundation already to submit a lawsuit against the application of these AI computers in this connection.

Possibly the ethical question will be does the government and our intelligence agencies have the right to snoop on citizens, pretend to be someone they are not, collect information regarding each potential individual, and stick that in to a file somewhere, or tucked away in certain giant data center? The fact is that when someone posts information online from the public, that information and facts are now in the public, and anyone may use it for any legitimate purpose.

Protecting the American people is within the realm of the government's responsibility based on the Usa Constitution plus a legitimate purpose you could argue prior to the Supreme Court. Thus, they would have the ability to gather every one of the public facts about anyone which happens to be on the net. Not only can they do this for American citizens, but in addition from potential threats of international terrorism, and people outside our country. Surely, our intelligence services and agencies will probably be working together with other governments world wide sharing these details.

Who seems to be to state that other governments are not already collecting information on Americans? It could behoove them to achieve this even when they didn't find any Americans were a threat to their countries or nations, for that simple reason to market us more of their goods that have been imported to the usa. Corporations collect your details all the time because maybe you are a buyer, you have joined their rewards program, or you happen to be known as someone who may potentially purchase something from their website in the future. They do have the authority to collect information they find online.

Let's say someone that is upset with something occurring worldwide writes rather disparaging comments about some agency, company, industry, or individual in the Washington Post website after a post they merely read - that information will probably be collected, and so the AI computer may contact that individual under false pretense, and attempt to start up a conversation. If it conversation leads the AI computer to imagine that this individual is problematic, psychotic, extremely angry, or prepared to make a change inside their own hands, then your threat assessment level will go up, and warning signs is going to be raised.

Remember, I had been discussing the difficulties of manpower from the intelligence industry and intelligence agencies. This is a real dilemma, for when we have a lot of false positives and spend a long time and cash in the wrong individuals, we are liable to let another person slip through. However, in case the artificial intelligent computer has brought seccurity the idea it could pass the Turing test without tipping away from the individual, it may in essence have conversations by e-mail with hundreds and hundreds of people in one afternoon.

Since this could be possible or possibly, already is, it will probably be a part of our future, our government, along with other governments, and people make use of these techniques, these plus some more We have not discussed in this particular article. Okay so, I assume you are wondering why I understand this? No comment. Indeed, I am hoping you've enjoyed today's technology briefing and enjoy your entire afternoon, I understand I will, and don't forget to put more information about yourself online on your social network. Ha ha ha. Please consider this all and think upon it.

Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Trackbacks are disabled.